USB data transfer test: N95 8GB vs 8800 Arte
Written by Meraj Chhaya on April 12, 2008 – 4:33 pm
Well I could have named this test S60 vs S40, or NSeries vs Extreme-luxury phone, but I think that both phones have different qualities, and therefore the results will be different.
The N95 8GB uses a miniUSB connector to USB, and obviously has a 8GB flash memory, and no memory card slot. The 8800 Arte uses a microUSB connector to USB, and this port is also used for charging. The phone has 1GB flash memory and no memory card slot.
The N95 8GB runs of Symbian OS 9.2 with S60 3rd edition Feature Pack 1. The Nokia 8800 Arte runs on Nokia OS with S40 5th edition.
To time both these tests, I used Stopwatch by TheXSoft, which is only accurate to the second, not that it really mattered, as the time interval quite long.
The computer I used is a HP TX1350 with 3 USB ports, running on Windows Vista Home Premium. CPU is AMD Turion64X2 at 2.2GHz and 2GB DDR2667 RAM.
So let the tests begin!
First was the N95 8GB, I sent a 119MB music file in MP3 format. What took really long was the transfer start, which ate almost 25s. The transfer took 3min and 13s.
The 8800 Arte took even longer to start the transfer, with more than 45s wasted. The same file was sent, and took 4min and 50s.
The N95 8GB produced a data rate of approximately 0.62MB/sec, while the 8800 Arte was left behind at approximately 0.41MB/sec. The speeds are way too low, and a test on Windows XP showed the same. The fault isn’t the computers, it’s the phones themselves.
The clear winner is the N95 8GB, now the question is, what made it win? The motherboard? miniUSB use? or the Operating System? Let me know what is your opinion
Tags: 8800 Arte, challenge, data transfer, mass storage mode, n95 8gb, Nokia, review, Test, USB
Posted in Nokia, Reviews, S60 |
6 Comments to “USB data transfer test: N95 8GB vs 8800 Arte”
Leave a Comment


April 14th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
I think the n95 8gb won because of the memory available. Also the motherboard is different. Well that’s my opinion. Can’t wait to see wat the other people say.
April 14th, 2008 at 9:48 pm
[...] Nokia’s ads can be strange at times » Control your phone with the camera! » USB data transfer test: N95 8GB vs 8800 Arte » G108 Watch Phone from the future » maybe some operators will make it [...]
April 14th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
My two cents: it’s the platform. The TI OMAP platform in the N95 vs. whatever is inside the 8800. But it’s sad to praise the N95 for this, imho. Those are USB1 speeds. USB2.0 has been around as a standard for long. Why can’t mobile chipset producers keep up? Beats me. But it’s one of the reasons that make me think that no matter how many GBs you throw in a phone, if transfer speed is that horrible, you’re gonna end up with frustrated users.
Vlad’s last blog post..Stay tuned!
April 15th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
I agree with you Vlad, hopefully the N96 won’t be this slow.
April 15th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
[...] Original article [...]
April 27th, 2008 at 8:06 am
[...] Meraj Chhaya over at PhoneReport has had a transfer-off between the N95 8GB and the 8800. [...]