<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PhoneReport v2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phonereport.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phonereport.info</link>
	<description>The latest news, reviews, interviews, and analysis on mobile phones and the telecommunications industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:33:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Mediabox N900 App by Zeeshan Ali</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/review-mediabox-n900-app/comment-page-1/#comment-7894</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeeshan Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=14817#comment-7894</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mediabox uses its own UPnP subsystem which is extremely lightweight and more compatible than gupnp.&quot;

Firstly, since N900 already ships gupnp on it, the size of this framework only adds to the size of gupnp no matter how &quot;light-weight&quot; it is.

Secondly, how do you claim its &quot;more comapitable&quot; than gupnp? we&#039;ve been working hard to make sure its as compatible as possible with existing upnp products out there and last i checked we pass all but one of the DLNA tests. Even if we are missing compatibility with some devices that mediabox author cared about, its nothing some informative bug reports to gupnp wouldn&#039;t have solved.

Fact is that the mediabox author wrote his own upnp stack because he was too lazy to write any c code, which he would have needed to do if he had used gupnp from python back then. It has nothing to do with gupnp being heavy or less compatible. Just wanted to get facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mediabox uses its own UPnP subsystem which is extremely lightweight and more compatible than gupnp.&#8221;</p>
<p>Firstly, since N900 already ships gupnp on it, the size of this framework only adds to the size of gupnp no matter how &#8220;light-weight&#8221; it is.</p>
<p>Secondly, how do you claim its &#8220;more comapitable&#8221; than gupnp? we&#8217;ve been working hard to make sure its as compatible as possible with existing upnp products out there and last i checked we pass all but one of the DLNA tests. Even if we are missing compatibility with some devices that mediabox author cared about, its nothing some informative bug reports to gupnp wouldn&#8217;t have solved.</p>
<p>Fact is that the mediabox author wrote his own upnp stack because he was too lazy to write any c code, which he would have needed to do if he had used gupnp from python back then. It has nothing to do with gupnp being heavy or less compatible. Just wanted to get facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MWC: Panasonic docomo PRIME series P-01A Review by Tomas</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/mwc-panasonic-docomo-prime-series-p-01a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=7479#comment-7877</guid>
		<description>Please where can i buy it outside of japan, and do you know anithing about Kingdom Hearts Coded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please where can i buy it outside of japan, and do you know anithing about Kingdom Hearts Coded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analysis: Nokia N97 vs Nokia N900 by narcis</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/analysis-nokia-n97-vs-nokia-n900/comment-page-1/#comment-7874</link>
		<dc:creator>narcis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=10294#comment-7874</guid>
		<description>i like n97.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like n97&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analysis: Nokia X6 vs Nokia N97 by Phani9</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/analysis-nokia-x6-vs-nokia-n97/comment-page-1/#comment-7872</link>
		<dc:creator>Phani9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=10838#comment-7872</guid>
		<description>Yes, Go for SATIO! 600Mhz processor , 12Mpx Camera with flash &amp; awesome 3.5&quot; screen.

If you want more power, go for Sony Ericsson Vivaz. USD486 on ebay.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Go for SATIO! 600Mhz processor , 12Mpx Camera with flash &amp; awesome 3.5&#8243; screen.</p>
<p>If you want more power, go for Sony Ericsson Vivaz. USD486 on ebay.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analysis: Nokia N97 vs Nokia N900 by nelson</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/analysis-nokia-n97-vs-nokia-n900/comment-page-1/#comment-7867</link>
		<dc:creator>nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=10294#comment-7867</guid>
		<description>Nokia 900 Oman Riyal 220.000 Nokia N 97 Oman Rial 187.000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia 900 Oman Riyal 220.000 Nokia N 97 Oman Rial 187.000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia Unsure on N900 Software Upgrade by Mad</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/nokia-unsure-on-n900-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-7866</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=14791#comment-7866</guid>
		<description>Really, i have been using Nokia phones since years ago.Now if they gona dump this one, Nokia will lose their respect and will lose there customers. I promise if that happed  i wont buy any Nokia phone as long as i live.Also i wont influence any one in the world to buy Nokia phones.
This is looking silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, i have been using Nokia phones since years ago.Now if they gona dump this one, Nokia will lose their respect and will lose there customers. I promise if that happed  i wont buy any Nokia phone as long as i live.Also i wont influence any one in the world to buy Nokia phones.<br />
This is looking silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analysis: Nokia N97 vs Nokia N900 by Islam</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/analysis-nokia-n97-vs-nokia-n900/comment-page-1/#comment-7863</link>
		<dc:creator>Islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=10294#comment-7863</guid>
		<description>i wanted to buy N97 but sometimes i read it&#039;s the best and sometimes i hear that it contains some bugs.!

also N900 the same but what i see that N97 has all features which anyone need,,on the other hand N900 has some missing features like MMS,Video Call and also i saw in specs. on a site that it has no Radio but you can put radio through a third party application

i am very confused as i can&#039;t take decision which is better N97 or N900

can anyone help??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wanted to buy N97 but sometimes i read it&#8217;s the best and sometimes i hear that it contains some bugs.!</p>
<p>also N900 the same but what i see that N97 has all features which anyone need,,on the other hand N900 has some missing features like MMS,Video Call and also i saw in specs. on a site that it has no Radio but you can put radio through a third party application</p>
<p>i am very confused as i can&#8217;t take decision which is better N97 or N900</p>
<p>can anyone help??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to fix a water-damaged phone by Coti</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/how-to-fix-a-water-damaged-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-7861</link>
		<dc:creator>Coti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=1128#comment-7861</guid>
		<description>I dropped my phone into the toilet last night but the battery didn&#039;t fall in just the phone itself. After hand drying it and disassembling and blow drying it then reassembling it there was a little bit of glitching in the screen and when I would press 1 it would do all of that row. Same for any button. I called the sprint customer service center for troubleshooting ideas to make it work quicker and they told me to remove the battery which it already was and plug it into the charger.... It turned on for maybe half a second and turned off and repeated this for about 2 hours then it gave me the emergency download screen: problem USB port which is where my charger port is. If I had to guess I would say something got shorted out. Does anyone with a little more knowledge recommend anything, or think this would help matters at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped my phone into the toilet last night but the battery didn&#8217;t fall in just the phone itself. After hand drying it and disassembling and blow drying it then reassembling it there was a little bit of glitching in the screen and when I would press 1 it would do all of that row. Same for any button. I called the sprint customer service center for troubleshooting ideas to make it work quicker and they told me to remove the battery which it already was and plug it into the charger&#8230;. It turned on for maybe half a second and turned off and repeated this for about 2 hours then it gave me the emergency download screen: problem USB port which is where my charger port is. If I had to guess I would say something got shorted out. Does anyone with a little more knowledge recommend anything, or think this would help matters at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia Unsure on N900 Software Upgrade by A. Nonymous</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/nokia-unsure-on-n900-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-7855</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Nonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=14791#comment-7855</guid>
		<description>If Nokia officially supports a complete reflash to Meego, I&#039;d give it a go. 

* I&#039;ve not loaded much data on it anyway yet, mostly because I can&#039;t get my important calendar data moved from my Nokia 6820 due to the Ovi/PC Suite backup/restore issue.
* All the apps I&#039;ve installed so far have been free.
* I&#039;d copy my documents away from the N900 and then back again under MeeGo.

Speaking of the backup issue: I can&#039;t yet restore my 6820 backup to the Maemo platform.  I wonder if we&#039;ll see MeeGo support for restoring old (legacy: S40?) backups soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Nokia officially supports a complete reflash to Meego, I&#8217;d give it a go. </p>
<p>* I&#8217;ve not loaded much data on it anyway yet, mostly because I can&#8217;t get my important calendar data moved from my Nokia 6820 due to the Ovi/PC Suite backup/restore issue.<br />
* All the apps I&#8217;ve installed so far have been free.<br />
* I&#8217;d copy my documents away from the N900 and then back again under MeeGo.</p>
<p>Speaking of the backup issue: I can&#8217;t yet restore my 6820 backup to the Maemo platform.  I wonder if we&#8217;ll see MeeGo support for restoring old (legacy: S40?) backups soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia Unsure on N900 Software Upgrade by Mick</title>
		<link>http://phonereport.info/nokia-unsure-on-n900-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-7840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phonereport.info/?p=14791#comment-7840</guid>
		<description>Also the guy that posted the CNET article messed it up so it looked like Meego was definitely NOT coming to the N900.

What he should have said was that you won&#039;t be able to install Meego over the top of Maemo. It would have to be a complete reflash, thus destroying any data, apps and documents that are already on the phone, and Maemo backups won&#039;t work on Meego either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the guy that posted the CNET article messed it up so it looked like Meego was definitely NOT coming to the N900.</p>
<p>What he should have said was that you won&#8217;t be able to install Meego over the top of Maemo. It would have to be a complete reflash, thus destroying any data, apps and documents that are already on the phone, and Maemo backups won&#8217;t work on Meego either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
